Critical Flaws, Errors and Omissions in CNSC staff’s EA report and case to approve the Chalk River Mound

February 21, 2022

Original version, sent to the CNSC president Rumina Velshi on February 21, 2021

*** Click on the blue hyperlink to read in your browser without downloading

February 25 (revised version with footnotes, submitted to the House of Commons standing committee on Environment and Sustainable Development)

*Click on the blue file name, just above to read in your browser without downloading.

3 thoughts on “Critical Flaws, Errors and Omissions in CNSC staff’s EA report and case to approve the Chalk River Mound”

Nuclear regulator’s case to approve giant nuclear waste mound is fraught with serious errors and omissions, citizens’ groups say – Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area says:

February 22, 2022 at 2:08 pm

[…] and Quebec provided Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) President Rumina Velshi with a searing critique of CNSC’s case to approve a giant radioactive waste mound alongside the Ottawa River in advance of […]

LikeLike

Reply
Call for intervenors ~ have your say on the Chalk River radioactive waste mound at the public hearings that start on May 31 – Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area says:

March 23, 2022 at 4:42 pm

[…] Critical Flaws, Errors and Omissions in CNSC staff’s case to approve the Chalk River Mound […]

LikeLike

Reply
Deadline Monday April 11 to apply to be an “intervenor” in the CNSC hearing for the giant Ottawa River nuclear waste dump – Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area says:

April 5, 2022 at 6:14 pm

[…] Critical Flaws, Errors and Omissions in CNSC staff’s case to approve the Chalk River Mound […]

LikeLike

Reply